Followers

Showing posts with label Moaning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Moaning. Show all posts

Friday, 31 July 2026

Gut reaction

This article popped up for me and crystalized my thoughts into a simple statement. "Fuck that, just send him home", as did a news report about an illegal immigrant still applying for asylum (from what?), who has been jailed for espousing and glorifying terrorism. Don't jail this parasite, just force him back to Turkey.

We don't need people like this importing their fights, their bigotry, their sob-stories, their desires, their criminality, their lack of comprehension about their newly desired social norms, their rabid religious inclinations, their "tribal" and "ethno-centric" aspirations for themselves but not the women around them, nor anyone else who is not like them.

To the British government I repeat myself - grow a pair, stop being nice to anyone who rocks up illegally, or those that facilitate their uninvited arrival. Block any appeal that they or their parasitic legal teams come up with and stop pandering to thought's of being "fair" - life isn't fair and gratuitous charity just leads to dependence or further deceptions. 

If the UK were likened to a ship, the crew are reaching mutiny because the captain will not repel boarders.


I don't want to feel like this!


The Spanish enclave of Ceuta was recently "invaded" by over 60,000 co-ordinated migrants in one day. They over-ran local border protocols and seemingly proved that mass invasion is the way to arrive. A BBC reporter was there at the time and it is alarming to see such an invasion, so may I refer you back to the "ship's" captain(s).

I've just read this post back to myself and never thought I could endorse such thoughts, but I am sick to death of  hearing the incessant drip of the national mantra that we must help such parasitic and needy peoples of the world. If arriving from a war zone house them as "guests" then repatriate them as one would prisoners of war. 

At the age of 68 I'm almost ashamed, but actuality has pushed me here.


Why come to us to for sanctuary as you "fight" your hate-fuelled cause?

Saturday, 17 January 2026

Sex, Sex, Sex and then just a bit more sex



Maybe because of my age, or a growing awareness of the ages of my four granddaughters, I am becoming sensitised, almost to a point of anger, to the constant drip-drip of overt and overly sexualised images and attitudes that we are all exposed to by "the media". Maybe I am just becoming an old git?

The lazy, easy-money sales pitch that sex(ynes) is all we need to be successful, appreciated and happy, even normal, is seemingly becoming more prevalent, whilst the further assertion that to be "sexy" you have to be young and thin is almost as obscene as the constant exploitation and pitching of aspirational sex(ynes).

Anyway - I'm not sure where to go with this blog so I've posted a poem (from long ago) when tenderness and affection did not require an obligatory fist of fun. (Wink Wink - know what I mean!)

Speaking Hands ...
LAURENCEAUX England LAURENCEAU Lawrenceaux LAWRENCEAU Laureanceaux LAURANCEAU Lawranceaux LAWRANCEAU Loranceaux LORANCEAU Lorranceaux LORRANCEAU POETRY Prose POEMS Social Comments HUMOUR Humerous SMILE Smiling LAUGH Laughing LAFF Laffing CYNICAL Truism TRUISMS Welcome HULL Kingston-Upon-Hull Kingston Upon Hull KINGSTON-ON-HULL Kingston On Hull YORKSHIRE East Yorkshire HUMBERSIDE Yorkshire DEPRESSION ThisISUll FED-UP Pissed-Off LONELY Disgruntled DISSOLUSIONED Blue BLACK Thinking BLOG Blogger LYONEL


Friday, 16 January 2026

Kath Hignet - Newsweek News


Kath Hignet News

This journalist's article (or A.I. Code) contains poor grammar foisted upon readers via Internet "News". I may read false news but I want it well written.

"A galaxy spinning around a hungry supermassive black hole that's guzzling down matter and shooting out plasma jets has grabbed the attention of astronomers 13 billion light years away. This plasma-spewing quasar is spurting out brighter radio emissions than anything else ever observed in the early universe."

Q. Are the astronomers really 13 billion light years away?
Q. Are we in the "early universe", or another?

A galaxy spinning around a hungry supermassive black hole that's 13 billion light years away (from earth) and guzzling down matter whilst shooting out plasma jets has grabbed the attention of astronomers 13 billion light years away. This plasma-spewing quasar is spurting out brighter radio emissions than anything else ever observed in the early universe.
-------------------- " --------------------

5th Feb 2024  
I came across this in an unattributed BBC article and it doesn't seem right. Call me pedantic if you wish, but I like things right (quite often my "right").

"Jason Elordi has been accused of grabbing the reporter behind a radio prank gone wrong by the throat."
OR
Jason Elordi has been accused of grabbing by the throat the reporter behind a radio prank gone wrong.
-------------------- " --------------------

30th Jun 2024  
Another a BBC article, this time by Lipica Pelham.

"French media reported that three armed, hooded men arrived at the reception venue in Thionville late on Saturday night before opening fire on guests."
OR
 (as they did not have three arms each)
French media reported that three hooded and armed men arrived at the reception venue in Thionville late on Saturday night, before opening fire on guests.
-------------------- " --------------------

3rd Jul 2024  
Another a BBC article, this time by Jeremy Britton.

"The suitcase was found 10 days later by a member of the public washed up on the riverbank downstream, still containing the body of Ms Begum."
OR
 (as the finder wasn't washed up)
Found by a member of the public, the suitcase was locate 10 days later, washed up on the downstream riverbank and still containing the body of Ms Begum.
-------------------- " --------------------

4th Oct 2024  
Another a BBC article, this time by Jack Burgess.

"A French judge reversed a ruling in the trial of a man who is accused of drugging his wife to sleep and recruiting dozens of men to abuse her for over a decade."
OR
 (as his wife was not actually asleep for a decade)
A French judge reversed a ruling in the trial of a man who is accused of repeatedly drugging his wife to sleep for over a decade and recruiting dozens of men to abuse her.

N.B. This is a terrible French crime and the details get worse, but its victim is dignified and stoic.
-------------------- " --------------------

24th Jan 2025 
Another unattributed BBC article.

"Ethan Armstrong, 26, pleaded guilty to one count of violent disorder at Hull Crown Court."
OR
 (as his violent disorder was not actually at Hull Crown Court)
Ethan Armstrong, 26, pleaded guilty at Hull Crown Court to one count of violent disorder.
-------------------- " --------------------

16th Jan 2026 
Another unattributed BBC article.

"French prosecutors have confirmed how a British couple died, five days after they were found in their rural home in south-west France."
OR
(Killed 5 days after being found in a French prosecutors' home?)
Five day after being found dead in their rural property in south-west France, French Prosecutors have confirmed how the British couple died.
-------------------- " --------------------

11th Feb 2025 
A Grimsby Live article.

"Walpole admitted three counts of making indecent photographs of children at Lincoln Magistrates' Court last year."
OR
(As the photographs were not really made at the court)
"At Lincoln Magistrates' Court Walpole admitted three counts of making indecent photographs of children last year."
-------------------- " --------------------

Monday, 12 January 2026

The NHS is dead


The NHS is nearly dead!

For years the British National Health Service (NHS) has been touted as the best public healthcare organisation in the world. IT IS NOT, nor has it been so for decades. It is no longer able to fulfil its intended responsibilities (set out in post-war years) and is no longer fit for purpose; indeed the latest (Labour) Government are finally acknowledging its final demise is near. Whether by intent, ignorance, inefficiency, political meddling, encroachment by profit taking private leaches, poor financial and resource planning, waste and loss of control over critical supporting components, including loss of doctors to other countries; it is no longer fit for purpose. Public confidence is at its lowest level, with over 7.5 million diagnosed treatment requirements listed that remain outstanding, with some lists over a year long; even the patience of patients (including me) is coming to an and as a national swath of excuses continue (I'm sick of still hearing the Covid backlog excuse!). It is currently so dysfunctional that even overseas newscasters report it and millions of pounds are "lost" as it insidiously outsource problems of their own creation, thereby accelerating the breakdown (break-up?) of the NHS in to a two-tier system of patient care: For those able to shop-around within the offered services and those that are not. Duplicity is also prevalent in the overseers of the NHS. 

We, the people, have allowed numerous governments to stealthily wind back the spirit of the NHS and its peripheral infrastructures for decades now. It is our fault that the NHS is failing, because we allow fuckwit politicians and "apparatchiks" to do as they desire under cover of "our" ignorance, indifference or apathy; that is not to say medical professionals within the NHS are blameless, for they have kept their timid heads down for years with few publicised whistle-blowers, perhaps because they know their money would keep coming anyway, or because an acknowledged and growing "toxic and bullying" culture intimidates them as parts rot from the inside. Even the Governments Care Quality Commission has been reviewed as not fit for purpose. To paraphrase a comment by former Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, "too many (in the NHS) have become very comfy in the tepid bath of managed decline". Ouch! 

Labour clearly wanted to shake-up the NHS following the sudden departure of the head of NHS England, so they abolished NHS England (and its 10000 employees), with the hope of successfully drilling down into issues that are long-standing and all too apparent. The former administrative body's work will be taken up by the Department of Health and Social Care who will look to changing how the NHS is run. It looks like the new broom in town is going to give the NHS a good scrubbing, though I understand few will mourn its passing. I had no understanding of what NHS England did, nor NHS Scotland and NHS Wales, but this article helped.

Everyone paying tax in the UK is statutorily contributing to the largest single employer in Europe and they are getting bugger-all back in many areas of the NHS once deemed important:  free prescriptions - gone, free dentistry and eyecare - gone, the availability of many local and social caring systems - gone, effective hospital administration - gone, effective GP services - gone. (GP now stands for generally poor as "super practices" are being formed throughout the land, giving service that at best is perfunctory). Everything we should value has been costed and wherever possible outsourced to organisations unknown and hidden in plain sight under NHS headed notepapers, in order to gain "efficiencies" and cost savings that have not made the NHS "better". Money that is being spent seems to be going on new estate, cutting edge medicines that benefit few, and all manner of frippery and corruption that doesn't really cure anyone; here I am thinking of the following: Political correctness and wokery,  help with being fat (eat less), smoking (just get on and die), drug addiction by self abuse (ditto), chronic self-harming (ditto), childlessness (adopt or foster and thereby save a poor soul) and addiction to computer game playing for God's sake (81 units in the UK). Most noticeable is the erection of new "sponsored estate" that increases facility but not effectiveness.

It seems to me that there are now too many risk-averse, secretive, hostile administrators; too many non-medical centric people beavering away in ways that no-longer directly facilitate the treatment of patients, but sometimes actually undermine their care. Senior administrators do not exhibit interest in patients anymore; they talk money, risk, excuse, expediency, secrets and unpublished intent, often overriding concerned parties and whistle blowers. My personal interaction with the NHS, by being in hospital a few times, suggests that staff on the ground floor of the patient interface are dedicated, effective and friendly, yet a bit fearful for their future. They know things are bad.

NHS whistle-blowers are not often heard of in the press, but in the case of convicted killer nurse Lucy Letby it was seen how "blowers" are often suppressed by "those above", who deny problems and refuse to act.

LUCY LETBY - though not really within the context of this article was a nurse who was convicted of killing many children in her charge and her post sentencing review revealed examples of corporate denial and obfuscation, symptomatic of the NHS? Hospital bosses said they were mislead and yet her hospital administrators ignored complaints about her (for fear of bad publicity) and children died during their procrastination; though some are still unsure about her conviction and others think she killed moresome think less. What is obvious is how opaque the upper working of the NHS is and the disquiet about her convictions, which just keeps coming.

Getting back to the NHS; from my hospital bed I observed some people getting the briefest of interactions with staff and subsequently discovered they were "bed-blockers" - people fit enough to leave hospital but not "allowed" to do so because of social care commitments not being fulfilled by other parts of the NHS, or indeed by familial responsibilities/expectations. Bed-blockers cost the NHS billions and are acknowledged by government to be one reason beds are in shortened supply, putting fresh patients at risk by blocking their free flow through the NHS. To put this particular problem into perspective, in the Royal Free Hospital in London between 15-30% of patients are medically fit to be discharged but are unable to leave for a myriad of reason, predicting that of 141,000 beds available to the NHS nationally, up to 42,000 cannot be used. NHS bed blockers lead to corridor blockers and  corridor blockers as those unfortunes destined to suffer on a trolley, often for many, many hours. There are even reported cases of people signing DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) forms so that they never have to endure corridor care again. 

The Nuffield Trust has reported bed-blocking numbers to Government for years yet the situation persists for tens of thousands of people and these two bed-blocking cases are particularly striking. A classic case of "bed blocking" and a woman who became like a prisoner in hospital, both caused by supposedly integrated social services failing. The NHS hospitals are doing their job, but social services are happy to renege on their paid responsibilities. (Though I do wonder if parents or family are dragging their feet also). 

The NHS no-longer delivers a service. It delivers a fractured and failing amalgamation of ever loosely bonded "facilities" designed to take the heat/demand out of core NHS services; "drop-in centres" exemplify this in that you drop in, they look at you without actual treatment and refer you back into a service no-longer working as it should. Perhaps drop-in centres (or unwanted shopping malls and large department stores) could be repurposed into residential care homes to house ex-patients stuck in NHS beds. The government houses immigrants at the drop of a hat, so why can't they store ex-patients, as indeed they once did in state financed care home beds? (Taking back a role outsourced by councils in the 90's to "save money").

Freeing beds for the sick should be a social priority, for the NHS still continues to waste billions on patients who don't need to be in hospital.

I predict that by 2035 the "NHS" will be an umbrella organisation below which will be a collection of separate corporate service providers responsible for enabling the aims of the "NHS". They will promise to do this if there is money to be had for themselves, though many, like Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (HUTH). Will remain fractured and found wanting in many areas of service.

ENOUGH!

Finally, if you don't like your NHS job then leave or move on, as your wages are fair and for some very good indeed, so stop disrupting  or "robbing" from this already ailing service. 

If you think this item is a valid critique of the NHS, then pass it on.

Friday, 2 January 2026

What is wrong with "British" parents?

What on earth is wrong with the recent generations of parents in the United Kingdom? Why will they not ensure their children are vaccinated when their time comes due, even as the UK loses its Measles elimination standing and a deadly Measles outbreak flare-up kills a child, when a Chickenpox epidemic is predicted, as so few children are inoculated. Why are parents so blasé about their responsibility.

Unlike my generation, modern parents are not as trusting of anything said by "officials", but are more than happy to trust their own judgement by predicting "their" child will not catch and spread the likes of Mumps, Measles, Chickenpox, Tetanus, Whooping Cough, Rubella, Typhus, Diphtheria and even Polio (from Pakistan), some of which can kill or severely maim their precious child(ren). Of these mumps is regarded as the most innocuous, but it can cause fitting and leave boys sterile. If you can't get to a vaccination centre, they may come to you and your kids, so call them!

I wonder how enraged parents would be following infection in their child or themselves via another unvaccinated child? Whooping Cough is particularly easy to transmit and is killing children to this day, as does Measles.

UK vaccinations for children are free so use them you fools. I don't care that you think they do not  work, that you are in a suspicious-minded ethnic group or have some crack-pot religious reasoning. Just do it and don't play with your child's health. The rest of the world believe in inoculation so why don't you? If worried about it, click here.


We know it makes sense










Smallpox killed millions but vaccination eradicated it globally











N.B. British parents are not unique in their misguided mistrust of inoculation, as illustrated by a localised but lethal Measles outbreak in Texas and a downturn globally, attributed to social media generated mistrust, the proliferation of wars and disruption to services by natural (climate change) consequences. Even sophisticated countries such as Canada and the US are not immune to willful ignorance.

The only winners in the innoculation war are the diseases and we don't want to go back there do we?

Saturday, 29 November 2025

Out of order my Lord (camel's back)

Dear reader,

I am giving up on this entry as it tedious, dispiriting and intensely annoying in equal measure, winding me up to a point of irrationality. In these times illegal immigrants are mostly "runaways" looking to better themselves alone, to escape their country which is probably no good for a reason. Our  governments, of recent decades, have no stomach to deliver what the settled indigenous population (of whites, blacks, Asians) wants. Governments have thrown prodigious amounts of money at this problem and failed. We need a paradigm shift of seismic proportion and we need it soon, before riotous behaviour ensues. Hanging flags by usually mild mannered people is the "smoke" of simmering revolt. 

The latest Government's policy statement will likely fail, though plans to seize mobile phones from illegal immigrants without the need of an arrest will likely reveal much valuable intelligence. (Why has it taken several years for anyone to come up with this effective idea?)

My paradigm shift for what it's worth is to pick-up illegal immigrants as normal, identify them as is normal and then immediately say, "welcome and off you go!" - no support, no housing, no hotels, no feeding, no taxis, no wasted taxes supporting them in any way. Tell them that though they think their life was bad where they came from, they can try it over here without any support whatsoever. People will say crime and shoplifting will rise, herds of roaming sullen illegals will result; to which I'd say no change there, but this country will not be burning literally billions of pounds to cater for unwanted and illegal visitors. When they get ready to move on, they would merely enter a police station and say I no-longer wish to be here.

You may continue to read my thoughts, written over three years, but are words really anything more than a delaying tactic.

---------- Original entry started in 2023 ----------

Two BBC reporters managed to detect and arrange the arrest of a "king pin" of illegal migration into the UK over the last ten years. "Scorpion" was even interviewed in Iraq before his arrest. How can these two achieve what the weight of many Governments couldn't? This question should have been an election question, not least because the BBC keep doing it and did it again by tracking and interviewing another smuggler, and a criminal group in Germany offering "whole trip" deals to illegal immigrants. Do the Germans not have any effective intelligence services either? True to their investigative skills the BBC embarrass the whole of the British "protective" services, by exposing yet another cross-channel smuggling gang and its members  These perpetrators should be rounded-up, interrogated by the military, for intelligence, and despatched. Click here to see evidence gathered by the BBC.

Whilst you are here, watch this BBC report from a French beach of illegal immigrants setting off for England in record health numbers, where the majority are just sick of their apparent impunity to drop in on us whenever the traffickers say so. This has been going on for years, we have paid the French authorities millions and millions of wasted pounds and literally billions on immigrants who arrive (as if by magic) with a vast array of excuses for wanting to be in the UK. My god, do we not have any workable strategies to stop this human tsunami? If the BBC can literally walk over to their boat, why won't the French do the same and disable it? It's rubber - puncture it! Seems like they are listening and that this cheap fix is being used.

The French don't want the migrants anymore than we do, yet they do like the colour of our money AND they blame the UK for their immigrant problems, perhaps with some truth if this video is not a scam, for it shows original immigrant boats impounded in the UK being loaded onto a lorry to be re-used in France. Why are such boats not destroyed immediately?


I'm no fan of the Express but here they have a point.


I think you get the picture. I know that just stopping people getting off the beaches is grasping the wrong end of this problem and that in Oct 2024 there was heartening progress in France, and Holland, followed by convictions abroad and here in the UK (and again in the UK), but this problem seems intractable, expensive and destabilising in Western Europe and yet, once again, the BBC can track down and interview a life-long people smuggler, then just to prove the apparent ineptitude of the UK government, they uncover and pursue another one. The British government recently announced another £75 million to tackle the problem, but my antipathy of their solutions makes me say don't give it to the French, give it to your political opposition, the Reform Party, for they seem to have the stomach for the task in-hand. They can't do any worse then the political filibustering that has occurred in this country for the last few decades, as public resentment of immigrants continues to simmer on its way to boiling  and revolt, as it seems to have happened in Ballymena in Northern Ireland.

The only positive decision, after years of waste is a deceptively simple statement from the government (in Feb 2025) that no-matter how you get into the UK, if you are deemed an illegal immigrant you will NEVER be granted UK citizenship, no-matter how long you manage to "hang-around" in the UK. If  you didn't go through "official channels" prior to arriving you are subject to immediate deportation. If this message becomes widespread immigration may be reduced, but my cynicism makes me thinks not for ejecting/deporting people remains difficult if they refuse to identify their true nationality, assuming of course a country will have them back (without the sort of huge leverage the USA can impose). As an add-on to this announcement, I'd like to see former immigrants such as this or this who go on to smuggle others into the country, or facilitate employment for illegals, have their citizenship revoked before being deported. Their partners/kids could stay if they wished. The Church and some unions are against this new approach but I think the church should sort-out their own problems (child abuse) and the unions protect the expectations of their own members, rather than others from overseas

After I read this and then this I nearly boiled over, for I am truly dismayed by the hand-wringing, politically correct, ineffective, wasteful, procrastinating, bull-shitters calling themselves the former British government cabinet, "the Tory party" or "the Conservatives" (or whatever); they truly were a bunch of spineless, frightened people who, in this example of aforementioned traits, would rather put unacceptable stress into the lives of students, just trying to get a university education to the ultimate betterment of this country (UK), than upset supporters of their ilk (parasitic lawyers, weak law-makers, whinging rights-activists, mis-aligned social support groups, et al).

By the way, don't think I'm for Labour, or the rest, just because I'm berating the Tories, because if any of them thought enough of their country we might hear some constructive words and offers of allegiance in cases of national crisis occasionally, instead of unceasing flatulent moaning about how bad the former Conservative government left things. 

Net immigration into the UK seems to be an Intractable problem and I think that new initiatives will prove even more expensive and still ineffective. The bottom line is that the message going back up the line to prospective illegal immigrants is just not painful enough and that the billions of pounds squandered on "asylum" seekers is being exposed to the wider public, who are rightly fed-up to the back teeth of this whole debacle.


Listen to me I represent your Government!


When will government ever address the illegal (unauthorised) immigrants and the issues they bring with them and how can they counter the righteous feelings of entitlement some seem to arrive with?

When will government finally "grow a pair", bite on a bullet and set in train a cohesive process that effectively sends back a "message" to all using and benefitting from the vile trade of people smuggling? Greece seems to be at the forefront of resistive force against illegal immigrant attempts to get in there, whilst Poland, Denmark and Sweden have already arrived at a point where their societies no-longer accept the "rights" of migrants merely looking for a better life, an easier living (as they see it) or a life away from internal feuds from whence they came. Their politics and politicians are hardening and there will be troubled times there for all; Poland will not accept any immigrants at all, whilst others are insisting true refugees (who go "home" when able) are granted temporary residency for that period alone. At the top tables of Europe, the response(s) to "detected" illegal immigrants hardens and amongst the masses in the UK, where we (are told to) welcome refugees, there is simmering resentment toward government and "illegals".

When will we stop wasting monumental amounts of public money in this country and abroad? - France, I want our money back, for you lot are taking the piss, and "Project Rwanda" costs (@£700,000,000.00) produced nothing and reflect a government squandering money given as tax, supposedly for the benefit UK, not Rwanda. If the government want to exile illegal immigrants, why don't we send them to South Georgia, near the Falkland Islands?

The "message" should be that life is no more fulfilling here than the lives many illegal immigrants would have, had they stayed in the place(s) they have fled or passed through, and that instead of wasting shed-loads of their money (or loans) to traffickers, they should use it to apply, through legal channels, for a life in this (my) country. 

I want us to invite selected immigrants to this country, not just disperse them around the country like so much night-soil, in the hope that the legal tax payers here will not spot them, nor care until hotels, student accommodation, ex-military bases and rented houses (of multiple occupancy) fill-up beside them. For those that do get here without their invitation in hand I want immediate incarceration off-shore*, not community care with all the leakage that occurs from that into the black economy, criminality, prostitution, slavery and organised crime groups. Chucking students out of their accommodation to store illegal immigrants is not a sane solution, though somewhere down the line the complicit owners of said student accommodation will, no doubt, be doing very nicely thankyou. 

* Incarceration off-shore means abroad or in international waters, by which "illegals" never get a legal toe-hold of acknowledgement that they have any right to UK residency, nor can they leach into the general populace uninvited. There must be many ocean-going ex cruise ships going cheap (after Covid), that could provide "luxurious" accommodation and security from which migrants could be granted entry or asked to get used to being at sea, or asked if they want assistance back to where they've came from. This will cost millions of course, but "they" are wasting that anyway and before you (readers) all go off on one, please know I am not against migration, just illegal and unmanaged migration and to those that travel they should know that though they may speak English, they have no right to drop-in when they like, in anyway they like, for as long as they like, in ever increasing numbers. Offshoring is not just a UK aspiration and many European countries are considering their stance, with Italy almost ready to implement their plan.

On a much lighter note, some illegal immigrants are statistically crazy, like this "tribe" in Scotland.


-- ROUND 2 --


To volunteers or self appointed aid workers in European states receiving the largest waves of immigrants, such as Italy, Spain, Greece and especially France (who merely expedite the passage of illegal immigrants through their country to the UK), I say you help no-one, because your actions are at the very least complicit in the migration of illegal arrivals and ignores the international rules for refugees, (seek refuge at the first point of safe contact before returning later), by assisting migration for the betterment of a life(style). Just because you volunteer to assist in the migration of hopeful migrants means nothing less than helping the illegal act of human trafficking. 

Illegal refugees are the problem for the whole of western Europe, but aiding their flow merely perpetuates that flow. For the billions wasted by recipient countries to "process" those they receive, perhaps that money could be better utilised with a new maritime iron curtain that repels invaders in the time honoured way, such is the scale of the gratuitous and flagrant human trafficking industry now.

From some readers I may get applause and from many more condemnation. I am indigenous "white", which some may see as my problem, but now also many first, second and third generation "immigrants" (who by definition of their legal residency are now British), are themselves asking why their earlier struggles for acceptance in the bad old days are being undermined by those who expect only open arms following their illegal, probably self-induced, harrowing journey. Such "gen1" immigrants, for example in the English town of Peterborough with a 25% new immigrant population, are now expressing their (rightful) voices. I think it also telling that the most popular new birth registrations are for "Muhammad" and variants, for the last two years.

In the scheme of things the ineffective UK government's (in)actions are small fry, but if I were a camel right now I'd be needing a back surgeon and though I know this is a rant into a void of indifference, help this country, please.


-- ROUND 3 --


The UK is in decline, but most importantly it is full and unable to serve it's existing population. It is not a land of dreams anymore and does not offer wealth, greater freedom(s), nor great opportunities.  To free-loaders of any kind, who may expect a hand-out, we are already broke and it's not worth your money (smuggling costs), nor efforts for your family or children in getting to the UK. 

To "true" refugees the UK should continue to offer temporary refuge (Ukraine and Gaza at this time) with the expectation of (forced) return following your agreed period of refuge. To those people your mindset should be that of  a POW - to get home as soon as possible (please).


People / Km2 - The UK is officially full - stay away!

If you think I'm not alone in thinking this way, just pass on a link to the page, as my commenting is now finished.


-- ROUND 4 --


The UK is loved by many but its ineffective "processes" seem unable to detect and eject "wrong-uns" and is breaking apart what was once a cohesive and tolerant British society. I have grave doubts that even now settled first and second wave immigrants will tolerate the flimsy, hand-wringing, money wasting, procrastination that has been the illegal immigration mantra from successive UK governments since the 90's. Here's more depressing crap to read ...

Perhaps this is a message to amplify

No messing there nor here

There is going to be extreme actions in Europe.

The Prime minster has finally picked up on the sentiment of his electorate

Trying to save £8million pound a day? - more like pre-election manoeuvring

You'd think things pertaining to illegal immigrants couldn't get any weirder and then this appears in the news. Charging an illegal immigrant with The manslaughter of fellow illegal immigrants whilst on the high seas does no-one other than parasitic lawyers any good. He's not even British and the act was at sea, so why do we have to prosecute and possibly house him in prison (at our expense). If I hear more of meddling, profiteering "human rights lawyers" with regard to illegal immigrants I'm going to scream. 


-- ROUND 5 --


What's the point in me shouting into a void of apathy, for few read this blog; just read these examples and tell your friends if you wish.


Mohammed - aspires to be a basketball player

This bloke dreams of becoming a basketball star, as he believes he'd be good at it, so he's prepared to pay a smuggler to get him to Europe so he can pass through to the USA. He is a classic example of many who merely dream of a "better life". He should get off his arse and strive to effect the life changes he dreams of right there where he is and certainly have no kids until he gets sorted. Why do we process such people with "due diligence". They  should be imprisoned upon arrival, then booked on a journey home?

= & =

Talib Rasul want's to stay in the UK

Why do we allow people like this to remain in the UK. He arrived here illegally, committed a sex crime, fled back to somewhere outside the UK, then smuggled himself and family back to the UK, thinking authorities would forget about his sex crime. Get this person out of the country.

= & =

Moroccan Ahmed Alid (murdering asylum seeker)

This fundamentalist from Morocco came seeking asylum in the UK after years of drifting around Europe (which I am certain is a safe refuge), but after becoming a criminal in Germany he thought he'd try his hand in the UK. He is an extremist of Islam who's residency claim was ongoing until he expressed his displeasure of Israel's action in Gaza, by randomly murdering a defenceless 71years old man, by stabbing him. Why should the UK now look after him in a UK prison rather than deporting him into the hands of the Moroccan police, to serve is life sentence there. We don't need any more nutters thank you.

= & =

Moroccan Hamza Faide (not fit to stay in the UK)

This chap is an ongoing asylum seeker who should be sent "home", for rather than trying to be on his best behaviour whilst his appeal is processed, he decided an altercation between a father and child, where he grabbed at the child and whipped his victim with his own dog's lead, was his best course of action. Already prosecuted in this country for thievery his past actions alone should terminate his appeal, unless he's now professing to be a church sponsored Christian (whatever they are).

= & =

Deng Chong Majek

Victim watched by Sudanese killer

The UK controls the entry of animals better than illegal immigrants as this piece of Trash from Sudan, who is still seeking asylum here, revealed his true nature by an abhorrent act upon an unrelated woman that he stabbed 23 times with a screwdriver. (She died 3 days later). He followed 27-year-old Rhiannon Whyte to a train station near his "hotel", at which she worked, attacked her and then returned to the hotel to chat with friends and dance to some music. He denied in court that CCTV And DNA did not incriminate him, though the jury took only two hours to pass his guilty verdict. I'd like to spit on his unmarked grave. 

= & =

Kidnapping rapists from Hull who should be sent "home"

I am sick to death of reading (common) news items like this. These animals, no doubt thankful for the refuge they desire(d) in the UK, kidnapped and collectively raped a woman, whilst pretending to be a taxi service. They each raped her, demanded £20 for the taxi service, then threw her out. Bastards! If you see them in prison now, why not reprimand them in a way they may understand.

= & =

Ngoc Nguyen and Hai Hoang (Vietnamese who need to be sent home)

Here's a pair of Vietnamese ne'er-do-wells (2 of many), here without permission, who need to be sent home - don't waste time and resources and money putting these industrial scale Cannabis cultivators in prison: make their sentence "to be send back home". They may not be the ring leaders, but they came uninvited to the UK and knew they were breaking our laws. I do not want them here. I don't want us to tolerate people like this.

= & =

Paulius Juknys - deport him and his family now

Here's yet another criminal coming to the UK illegally and thinking they can do what they like. Instead of wasting our money housing him in prison for 4 years, he and his family should be deported back to their country of origin: make his sentence "to be send back home".

= & =

Brwa Shorsh - back to Kurdistan please

A Kurdish and homeless migrant (illegal or otherwise), Brwa Shorsh, 24, deliberately and without provocation pushed a Polish immigrant (settled and working as a postman) onto a live subway line, meters in front of an approaching train. He was upset that the postman "looked at him funny"! This nutcase has been found guilty and should be deported as an undesirable back to Kurdistan to serve his sentence or not. We don't want him or need the costs of his prison sentence - just send him back please before he gets into more trouble.

= & =

Romanian Ioan Pintaru - child killer in the UK

Here's yet another uninvited "visitor" causing mayhem in the UK, by stabbing an 11year old girl 8 times, this Romanian national was homeless yet not finding life so bad here that he did not return there. Whatever his excuse for staying in the UK he has none now. He should be tried, sentenced and then forcibly be sent back to Romania to do his time there, for he does not deserve the costly "luxury" of a UK cell; neither does this Congolese import, who some reason (what reason exactly?) could not be deported back there.

= & =

Abdul Shokoor Ezedi (Cowardly attacked woman and injured himself)

Here's another "refugee" who sought UK sanctuary, this time from Afghanistan, who has consistently abused our hospitality. Sending this sexually assaulting, thief and acid-throwing vile piece of shit back into the cess-pit from whence ha came should be the norm. He should be easy to find (£20,000 reward) as he managed to pour the corrosive over his own face. No arguments now, just put him on a (military) plane and drop him off "home"; for assaulting and disfiguring a woman and two children, with whom he'd had a relationship, he has no excuse whatsoever. Like I said: a piece of shit who succinctly illustrates our failing immigration processing.

Update - 20th Feb 2024: CCTV analysis tracked him across London for over two hours, leading to a police conclusion, "that he entered the Thames and drowned"; seemingly confirmed by a recovered body wearing clothes very similar to Ezedi's, though I would have thought a half melted face would have been proof positive. He got the death he deserved, but the fact he was both sponsored and then shunned by the church, because of his misbehaviour, is an indictment of the church's meddling in-house immigrant processing; why can't they understand that "conversion" to Christianity (whatever that is these days) is merely a tactic to prevent them ever being sent back to where they lived. 

Tuesday, 18 November 2025

Groomers

Dear reader,

With the announcement of yet another new grooming gangs enquiry (the first started in 2022), I am giving up on this entry as it is tedious, dispiriting and intensely annoying in equal measure,  winding me up to a point of irrationality. Groomers and grooming gangs are merely a fraction of criminalised activities that generate victims; in their case children. Once you become aware of this scourge amongst us it is even more alarming to realise how common it seems to be. For tracking purposes you may wish to review A Facebook site.

I feel that the light touch of liberalism that blossomed in the 1960s has had its go in the jurisdiction of the UK and it is time for change, including the re-instatement of death sentences. 

You may read below my thoughts, written over two years, but are words really anything more than a delaying tactic.

---------- Original entry started in 2024 ----------

It was announced by the UK Prime Minister and his side-kick, Rachel Reeves, that there will be further investigation into "grooming" gangs (who thus far have been almost exclusively men of Asian descent) following the recent Casey report on them and individuals who have plagued the UK for at least 20 years, often using the same methods, leading to the same results: Young girls, mainly white, abused and tortured for years, with apparent indifference and prejudice (some say Collusion) from police (certainly), social services and child care homes. The girls were and are still being written-off as (just) "run-aways", child prostitutes or general miscreants, even though some complained to many authorities charged with their care and protection. Having acknowledged an earlier preoccupation with "ethnic sensitivities" the National Crime Agency (NCA) are now seeking to reiterate that laws will always trump anyone, for they are now proactively targeting reported grooming gangs with no regard to accusations of racial bias. At this time the Metropolitan Police are investigating 9000 grooming cases, whilst the NCA say that "human error" led to many grooming cases being dropped in the past.

It is good to see grooming gangs being identified for prosecution, but two former victims have resigned their roles on the latest government investigative commission, stating that in their view the commission are (still) "less about the truth and more about a cover-up"; their views were endorsed when other victims did likewise, prompting the government's Home Secretary to issue a statement that she will not allow the enquiry to lose focus, though the victim's group are asking for the Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips to resign, accusing her of betrayal. My feeling is that victims are worried that people and organisations who should have acted years ago, who are now their own investigators, may allow the scope of this investigation to widen in order to reduce their culpability.

Some grooming gangs and individuals have been successfully prosecuted and jailed, but only after the agitations and protests of a noble few police and social care workers, though the national press are now all over this, with an eye to sales no doubt.

Here I present cases that are notorious or at least made it to public attention.

What is about Rochdale and it's pussyfoot policing that nothing seems to change there, for once again yet another "gang" of Asian looking men (that's all "we" are allowed to say) have been found guilty of grooming, raping and "passing around" exclusively white girls, having organised themselves into a formal grouping to do such things. These bastards should be fully exposed to investigation from day one of any complaint, as such complaints are routinely discovered to be the truth from girls brave enough to complaint about their appalling and degrading treatment. Their prison time should be as cruel to them as they were to their many victims.

I'd like to think that these scum have real hard times in prison after their organised and systematic abuse of girls as young as 11

 = & =

This grooming gang, again from Rochdale, were convicted and sentenced to may decades in prison. From top to bottom, reading right, this crew were lead by "boss man" Mohammed Zahid, Mohammed Shahzad, Mushtag Ahmed, Kasie Basir, Nisar Hussain, Roheez Khan and Naheem Akram.


How proud their extended families must be of them!

= & =

Hang them

I hear paedophiles in prison are dead men (and women!) walking and hope these Scottish scumbag paedo smackheads get what they rightfully deserve in prison; raping children still in nappies is beyond redemption, yet they have been given permission to appeal their convictions, at "our" expense.

= & =

After Brexit they have no right to stay in the UK

Here's a pair of Romanian criminals, Sexually exploiting women in the UK. Following Brexit they have no absolute right to stay here, but did we ask them to go "home"? What do you think? If you see them in back in Doncaster, remind them that Romania is a better place to live now.

= & =

Sickening Dean Fieldsend and Stephen Sweeting (of Hull and Bubwith )

In my new world these two would now be hung. Fieldsend for his 3rd guilty verdict, who has proved himself to be an irredeemable paedophile in his pursuit of children (18 months - 9 years), whilst Sweeting has a record of sexual offences against children going back to 1968. If you happen to meet either of these vile people they should be reminded of their crimes. 


= & =

Child rapists Mark and Robert Evans - more perverts from Rotherham

The two brothers above are going to have a real hard time in prison (I hope), having been sentenced to 17 and 14 years for grooming, then raping, girls as young as 13.

= & =

Ashley Darbyshire from Bolton

Here we have another to have a very hard time in prison, as he is rightly reviled as a rapist of children whom he groomed in Bolton.

= & =

David Brennan of Hull - A user of 12-year olds!

Another piece of shit  from Hull who will be getting 20 years of hard times.

= & =

Connor Laud from Hull loves abusing kids

Yet another monster from Hull, this one rapes children to satisfy his sadistic perversions. Let's hope his time in prison denies him future use of his "equipment".

= & =

Graham Hart loves kids!

Yet another one goes to prison for 17 years to endure a very hard time, hopefully, for being a destroyer of innocence.

= & =

Alex Fullard -Child Rapist

Sentenced to 21 years for multiply child rapes, Alex Fulford will not be tolerated by "regular" inmates, who may give him reason to reflect upon his deviant desires

= & =

Driffield's groomer - Roy Borrowdale

Sentence to 25 years for horrific sexual abuse of minors, since 2010. He'll probably die in prison.

= & =

Paul Lipscombe

Yet another groomer/rapist/distributer of child abuse videos who raped children as young as "under 13", over a proven period years. NHS manager Paul Lipscombe was sentenced to 28 years, but I would hang him. Let's hope his fellow prisoners agree.