Dear reader,
I am giving up on this entry as it tedious, dispiriting and intensely annoying in equal measure, winding me up to a point of irrationality. In these times illegal immigrants are mostly "runaways" looking to better themselves alone, to escape their country which is probably no good for a reason and our governments, of recent decades, have no stomach to deliver what the settled indigenous population (of whites, blacks, Asians) wants. Governments have throw prodigious amounts of money at this problem and failed. We need a paradigm shift of seismic proportion and we need it soon, before riotous behaviour ensues. Hanging flags by usually mild mannered people is the "smoke" of simmering revolt. The latest Government's policy statement will likely fail.
My paradigm shift for what it's worth is to pickup illegal immigrants as normal, identify them as normal and then immediately say, "welcome and off you go!" - no support, no housing, no hotels, no feeding, no taxis, no wasted taxes supporting them in any way. Tell them that though they think their life was bad where they came from, they can try it over here without any support whatsoever. People will say crime and shoplifting will rise, herds of roaming sullen illegals will result; to which I'd say no change there, but this country will not be burning literally billions of pounds to cater for unwanted and illegal visitors. When they get ready to move on, they would merely enter a police station and say I no-longer wish to be here.
You may continue to read my thoughts, written over two years, but are words really anything more than a delaying tactic.
---------- Original entry started in 2023 ----------
Two BBC reporters managed to detect and arrange the arrest of a "king pin" of illegal migration into the UK over the last ten years. "Scorpion" was even interviewed in Iraq before his arrest. How can these two achieve what the weight of many Governments couldn't? This question should have been an election question, not least because the BBC keep doing it and did it again by tracking and interviewing another smuggler, and a criminal group in Germany offering "whole trip" deals to illegal immigrants. Do the Germans not have any effective intelligence services either? True to their investigative skills the BBC embarrass the whole of the British "protective" services, by exposing yet another cross-channel smuggling gang and its members These perpetrators should be rounded-up, interrogated by the military, for intelligence, and despatched. Click here to see evidence gathered by the BBC.
Whilst you are here, watch this BBC report from a French beach of illegal immigrants setting off for England in record health numbers, where the majority are just sick of their apparent impunity to drop in on us whenever the traffickers say so. This has been going on for years, we have paid the French authorities millions and millions of wasted pounds and literally billions on immigrants who arrive (as if by magic) with a vast array of excuses for wanting to be in the UK. My god, do we not have any workable strategies to stop this human tsunami? If the BBC can literally walk over to their boat, why won't the French do the same and disable it? It's rubber - puncture it! Seems like they are listening and that this cheap fix is being used.
The French don't want the migrants anymore than we do, yet they do like the colour of our money AND they blame the UK for their immigrant problems, perhaps with some truth if this video is not a scam, for it shows original immigrant boats impounded in the UK being loaded onto a lorry to be re-used in France. Why are such boats not destroyed immediately?
 |
| I'm no fan of the Express but here they have a point. |
I think you get the picture. I know that just stopping people getting off the beaches is grasping the wrong end of this problem and that in Oct 2024 there was heartening progress in France, and Holland, followed by convictions abroad and here in the UK (and again in the UK), but this problem seems intractable, expensive and destabilising in Western Europe and yet, once again, the BBC can track down and interview a life-long people smuggler, then just to prove the apparent ineptitude of the UK government, they uncover and pursue another one. The British government recently announced another £75 million to tackle the problem, but my antipathy of their solutions makes me say don't give it to the French, give it to your political opposition, the Reform Party, for they seem to have the stomach for the task in-hand. They can't do any worse then the political filibustering that has occurred in this country for the last few decades, as public resentment of immigrants continues to simmer on its way to boiling and revolt, as it seems to have happened in Ballymena in Northern Ireland.
The only positive decision, after years of waste is a deceptively simple statement from the government (in Feb 2025) that no-matter how you get into the UK, if you are deemed an illegal immigrant you will NEVER be granted UK citizenship, no-matter how long you manage to "hang-around" in the UK. If you didn't go through "official channels" prior to arriving you are subject to immediate deportation. If this message becomes widespread immigration may be reduced, but my cynicism makes me thinks not for ejecting/deporting people remains difficult if they refuse to identify their true nationality, assuming of course a country will have them back (without the sort of huge leverage the USA can impose). As an add-on to this announcement, I'd like to see former immigrants such as this or this who go on to smuggle others into the country, or facilitate employment for illegals, have their citizenship revoked before being deported. Their partners/kids could stay if they wished. The Church and some unions are against this new approach but I think the church should sort-out their own problems (child abuse) and the unions protect the expectations of their own members, rather than others from overseas
After I read this and then this I nearly boiled over, for I am truly dismayed by the hand-wringing, politically correct, ineffective, wasteful, procrastinating, bull-shitters calling themselves the former British government cabinet, "the Tory party" or "the Conservatives" (or whatever); they truly were a bunch of spineless, frightened people who, in this example of aforementioned traits, would rather put unacceptable stress into the lives of students, just trying to get a university education to the ultimate betterment of this country (UK), than upset supporters of their ilk (parasitic lawyers, weak law-makers, whinging rights-activists, mis-aligned social support groups, et al).
By the way, don't think I'm for Labour, or the rest, just because I'm berating the Tories, because if any of them thought enough of their country we might hear some constructive words and offers of allegiance in cases of national crisis occasionally, instead of unceasing flatulent moaning about how bad the former Conservative government left things.
Net immigration into the UK seems to be an Intractable problem and I think that new initiatives will prove even more expensive and still ineffective. The bottom line is that the message going back up the line to prospective illegal immigrants is just not painful enough and that the billions of pounds squandered on "asylum" seekers is being exposed to the wider public, who are rightly fed-up to the back teeth of this whole debacle.
 |
| Listen to me I represent your Government! |
When will government ever address the illegal (unauthorised) immigrants and the issues they bring with them and how can they counter the righteous feelings of entitlement some seem to arrive with?
When will government finally "grow a pair", bite on a bullet and set in train a cohesive process that effectively sends back a "message" to all using and benefitting from the vile trade of people smuggling? Greece seems to be at the forefront of resistive force against illegal immigrant attempts to get in there, whilst Poland, Denmark and Sweden have already arrived at a point where their societies no-longer accept the "rights" of migrants merely looking for a better life, an easier living (as they see it) or a life away from internal feuds from whence they came. Their politics and politicians are hardening and there will be troubled times there for all; Poland will not accept any immigrants at all, whilst others are insisting true refugees (who go "home" when able) are granted temporary residency for that period alone. At the top tables of Europe, the response(s) to "detected" illegal immigrants hardens and amongst the masses in the UK, where we (are told to) welcome refugees, there is simmering resentment toward government and "illegals".
When will we stop wasting monumental amounts of public money in this country and abroad? - France, I want our money back, for you lot are taking the piss, and "Project Rwanda" costs (@£700,000,000.00) produced nothing and reflect a government squandering money given as tax, supposedly for the benefit UK, not Rwanda.
The "message" should be that life is no more fulfilling here than the lives many illegal immigrants would have, had they stayed in the place(s) they have fled or passed through, and that instead of wasting shed-loads of their money (or loans) to traffickers, they should use it to apply, through legal channels, for a life in this (my) country.
I want us to invite selected immigrants to this country, not just disperse them around the country like so much night-soil, in the hope that the legal tax payers here will not spot them, nor care until hotels, student accommodation, ex-military bases and rented houses (of multiple occupancy) fill-up beside them. For those that do get here without their invitation in hand I want immediate incarceration off-shore*, not community care with all the leakage that occurs from that into the black economy, criminality, prostitution, slavery and organised crime groups. Chucking students out of their accommodation to store illegal immigrants is not a sane solution, though somewhere down the line the complicit owners of said student accommodation will, no doubt, be doing very nicely thankyou.
* Incarceration off-shore means abroad or in international waters, by which "illegals" never get a legal toe-hold of acknowledgement that they have any right to UK residency, nor can they leach into the general populace uninvited. There must be many ocean-going ex cruise ships going cheap (after Covid), that could provide "luxurious" accommodation and security from which migrants could be granted entry or asked to get used to being at sea, or asked if they want assistance back to where they've came from. This will cost millions of course, but "they" are wasting that anyway and before you (readers) all go off on one, please know I am not against migration, just illegal and unmanaged migration and to those that travel they should know that though they may speak English, they have no right to drop-in when they like, in anyway they like, for as long as they like. Offshoring is not just a UK aspiration and many European countries are considering their stance, with Italy almost ready to implement their plan.
On a much lighter note, some illegal immigrants are statistically crazy, like this "tribe" in Scotland.
-- ROUND 2 --
To volunteers or self appointed aid workers in European states receiving the largest waves of immigrants, such as Italy, Spain, Greece and especially France (who merely expedite the passage of illegal immigrants through their country to the UK), I say you help no-one, because your actions are at the very least complicit in the migration of illegal arrivals and ignores the international rules for refugees, (seek refuge at the first point of safe contact before returning later), by assisting migration for the betterment of a life(style). Just because you volunteer to assist in the migration of hopeful migrants means nothing less than helping the illegal act of human trafficking.
Illegal refugees are the problem for the whole of western Europe, but aiding their flow merely perpetuates that flow. For the billions wasted by recipient countries to "process" those they receive, perhaps that money could be better utilised with a new maritime iron curtain that repels invaders in the time honoured way, such is the scale of the gratuitous and flagrant human trafficking industry now.
From some readers I may get applause and from many more condemnation. I am indigenous "white", which some may see as my problem, but now also many first, second and third generation "immigrants" (who by definition of their legal residency are now British), are themselves asking why their earlier struggles for acceptance in the bad old days are being undermined by those who expect only open arms following their illegal, probably self-induced, harrowing journey. Such "gen1" immigrants, for example in the English town of Peterborough with a 25% new immigrant population, are now expressing their (rightful) voices. I think it also telling that the most popular new birth registrations are for "Muhammad" and variants, for the last two years.
In the scheme of things the ineffective UK government's (in)actions are small fry, but if I were a camel right now I'd be needing a back surgeon and though I know this is a rant into a void of indifference, help this country, please.
-- ROUND 3 --
The UK is in decline, but most importantly it is full and unable to serve it's existing population. It is not a land of dreams anymore and does not offer wealth, greater freedom(s), nor great opportunities. To free-loaders of any kind, who may expect a hand-out, we are already broke and it's not worth your money (smuggling costs), nor efforts for your family or children in getting to the UK.
To "true" refugees the UK should continue to offer temporary refuge (Ukraine and Gaza at this time) with the expectation of (forced) return following your agreed period of refuge. To those people your mindset should be that of a POW - to get home as soon as possible (please).
 |
| People / Km2 - The UK is officially full - stay away! |
If you think I'm not alone in thinking this way, just pass on a link to the page, as my commenting is now finished.
-- ROUND 4 --
The UK is loved by many but its ineffective "processes" seem unable to detect and eject "wrong-uns" and is breaking apart what was once a cohesive and tolerant British society. I have grave doubts that even now settled first and second wave immigrants will tolerate the flimsy, hand-wringing, money wasting, procrastination that has been the illegal immigration mantra from successive UK governments since the 90's. Here's more depressing crap to read ...
Perhaps this is a message to amplify
No messing there nor here
There is going to be extreme actions in Europe.
The Prime minster has finally picked up on the sentiment of his electorate.
Trying to save £8million pound a day? - more like pre-election manoeuvring
You'd think things pertaining to illegal immigrants couldn't get any weirder and then this appears in the news. Charging an illegal immigrant with The manslaughter of fellow illegal immigrants whilst on the high seas does no-one other than parasitic lawyers any good. He's not even British and the act was at sea, so why do we have to prosecute and possibly house him in prison (at our expense). If I hear more of meddling, profiteering "human rights lawyers" with regard to illegal immigrants I'm going to scream.
-- ROUND 5 --
What's the point in me shouting into a void of apathy, for few read this blog; just read these examples and tell your friends if you wish.
 |
| Mohammed - aspires to be a basketball player |
This bloke dreams of becoming a basketball star, as he believes he'd be good at it, so he's prepared to pay a smuggler to get him to Europe so he can pass through to the USA. He is a classic example of many who merely dream of a "better life". He should get off his arse and strive to effect the life changes he dreams of right there where he is and certainly have no kids until he gets sorted. Why do we process such people with "due diligence". They should be imprisoned upon arrival, then booked on a journey home?
= & =
 |
| Talib Rasul want's to stay in the UK |
Why do we allow people like this to remain in the UK. He arrived here illegally, committed a sex crime, fled back to somewhere outside the UK, then smuggled himself and family back to the UK, thinking authorities would forget about his sex crime. Get this person out of the country.
= & =
 |
| Moroccan Ahmed Alid (murdering asylum seeker) |
This fundamentalist from Morocco came seeking asylum in the UK after years of drifting around Europe (which I am certain is a safe refuge), but after becoming a criminal in Germany he thought he'd try his hand in the UK. He is an extremist of Islam who's residency claim was ongoing until he expressed his displeasure of Israel's action in Gaza, by randomly murdering a defenceless 71years old man, by stabbing him. Why should the UK now look after him in a UK prison rather than deporting him into the hands of the Moroccan police, to serve is life sentence there. We don't need any more nutters thank you.
= & =
 |
| Moroccan Hamza Faide (not fit to stay in the UK) |
This chap is an ongoing asylum seeker who should be sent "home", for rather than trying to be on his best behaviour whilst his appeal is processed, he decided an altercation between a father and child, where he grabbed at the child and whipped his victim with his own dog's lead, was his best course of action. Already prosecuted in this country for thievery his past actions alone should terminate his appeal, unless he's now professing to be a church sponsored Christian (whatever they are).
= & =
 |
| Deng Chong Majek |
 |
| Victim watched by Sudanese killer |
The UK controls the entry of animals better than illegal immigrants as this piece of Trash from Sudan, who is seeking asylum here, revealed his true nature by an abhorrent act upon an unrelated woman that he stabbed 23 times with a screwdriver. (She died 3 days later). He followed 27-year-old Rhiannon Whyte to a train station near his "hotel", at which she worked, attacked her and then returned to the hotel to chat with friends and dance to some music. He denied in court that CCTV And DNA did not incriminate him, though the jury took only two hours to pass his guilty verdict. I'd like to spit on his unmarked grave.
= & =
 |
| Kidnapping rapists from Hull who should be sent "home" |
I am sick to death of reading (common) news items like this. These animals, no doubt thankful for the refuge they desire(d) in the UK, kidnapped and collectively raped a woman, whilst pretending to be a taxi service. They each raped her, demanded £20 for the taxi service, then threw her out. Bastards! If you see them in prison now, why not reprimand them in a way they may understand.
= & =
 |
| Ngoc Nguyen and Hai Hoang (Vietnamese who need to be sent home) |
Here's a pair of Vietnamese ne'er-do-wells (2 of many), here without permission, who need to be sent home - don't waste time and resources and money putting these industrial scale Cannabis cultivators in prison: make their sentence "to be send back home". They may not be the ring leaders, but they came uninvited to the UK and knew they were breaking our laws. I do not want them here. I don't want us to tolerate people like this.
= & =
 |
| Paulius Juknys - deport him and his family now |
Here's yet another criminal coming to the UK illegally and thinking they can do what they like. Instead of wasting our money housing him in prison for 4 years, he and his family should be deported back to their country of origin: make his sentence "to be send back home".
.jpg) |
| Brwa Shorsh - back to Kurdistan please |
A Kurdish and homeless migrant (illegal or otherwise), Brwa Shorsh, 24, deliberately and without provocation pushed a Polish immigrant (settled and working as a postman) onto a live subway line, meters in front of an approaching train. He was upset that the postman "looked at him funny"! This nutcase has been found guilty and should be deported as an undesirable back to Kurdistan to serve his sentence or not. We don't want him or need the costs of his prison sentence - just send him back please before he gets into more trouble.
= & =
 |
| Romanian Ioan Pintaru - child killer in the UK |
Here's yet another uninvited "visitor" causing mayhem in the UK, by stabbing an 11year old girl 8 times, this Romanian national was homeless yet not finding life so bad here that he did not return there. Whatever his excuse for staying in the UK he has none now. He should be tried, sentenced and then forcibly be sent back to Romania to do his time there, for he does not deserve the costly "luxury" of a UK cell; neither does this Congolese import, who some reason (what reason exactly?) could not be deported back there.
= & =
 |
| Abdul Shokoor Ezedi (Cowardly attacked woman and injured himself) |
Here's another "refugee" who sought UK sanctuary, this time from Afghanistan, who has consistently abused our hospitality. Sending this sexually assaulting, thief and acid-throwing vile piece of shit back into the cess-pit from whence ha came should be the norm. He should be easy to find (£20,000 reward) as he managed to pour the corrosive over his own face. No arguments now, just put him on a (military) plane and drop him off "home"; for assaulting and disfiguring a woman and two children, with whom he'd had a relationship, he has no excuse whatsoever. Like I said: a piece of shit who succinctly illustrates our failing immigration processing.
Update - 20th Feb 2024: CCTV analysis tracked him across London for over two hours, leading to a police conclusion, "that he entered the Thames and drowned"; seemingly confirmed by a recovered body wearing clothes very similar to Ezedi's, though I would have thought a half melted face would have been proof positive. He got the death he deserved, but the fact he was both sponsored and then shunned by the church, because of his misbehaviour, is an indictment of the church's meddling in-house immigrant processing; why can't they understand that "conversion" to Christianity (whatever that is these days) is merely a tactic to prevent them ever being sent back to where they lived.
.jpg)
